It finally is time for ALDLAND to weigh in on the NFL controversy that has reemerged in force this season: What To Do Or Not Do About The Washington Redskins From A Mascot Perspective.
If you haven’t been following this story this year, don’t worry: no one has said anything insightful about, and no one has changed positions on whether the Redskins should change their name. Washington owner Dan Snyder is not going to change his mind, and he isn’t going to change the name unless NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell forces him to do so, and Goodell has been maybe waffling on the issue.
I don’t have anything to add to the debate, but now feels like a good time to move past the preliminary phase of the conversation and start proposing some alternative mascots. And by “now,” I mean the day after the team’s current
running backtight end, Fred Davis, said Snyder should rename the team the Fredskins. Not bad. Inspired, this came to me in a flash this morning:
I think the Washington Monuments really would be a great new name for the team. It’s location-specific, addresses Snyer’s concern for honoring history, and is only indirectly linked to Anglo-American racial hegemony.
If you’re still thinking about the Fredskins, here‘s an artist’s rendering of a possible logo along that line. If you have another idea, post it in the comments below.
I am reminded that Brendan has offered suggestions on this topic as well: https://aldland.wordpress.com/2013/06/28/aldland-podcast-35/.
Pingback: Mike Shanahan channels Brady Hoke, Falcons hang on to win 27-26 | ALDLAND
Pingback: Happy Holidays from ALDLAND | ALDLAND
Pingback: The Super Bowl commercial you won’t see on television tonight | ALDLAND
Pingback: Sporting Geography: Soccer’s arrival in Atlanta stirs old conflicts | ALDLAND